Phac skills enhancement online dating
These themes include: To analyze the data received through the knowledge exchange sessions, responses were read and notes were made to reflect the knowledge exchange session discussion and facilitator observations.
In addition to considering content, context and facilitation constructs in their design, the data collection questions were themed to align with, and build on those identified in the Survey of CIHR-Funded Hepatitis C Researchers completed in 20 respectively (10).Some felt that equal funding for basic science and psycho-social research was inappropriate given the number of grants submitted for competition, while others felt that quality of life and prevention research as relates to behaviour was underfunded.Subsequent to examining funding for current and future research topics, funding for research approaches (specifically participatory action research) was also discussed.Firstly, participants identified a lack of funding for research related to high risk populations including those with co-morbidities such as HIV or liver disease, and marginalized populations such as aboriginals, recent immigrants, intravenous drug users, men who have sex with men and those living in rural/remote communities.Funding for research related to effective prevention (both vaccines and behavioural models) strategies was also identified as a gap.The invitation to participate in one of two online knowledge exchange sessions and/or an electronic survey was successfully delivered to 75 emails.
10 stakeholders completed the electronic survey, eight participated in the first knowledge exchange session and six participated in the second knowledge exchange session for a total of 24 respondents.
Number of respondents by Province / Territory Figure 3 long description Figure 4.
Number of respondents who have received funding from the CIHR-PHAC Hepatitis C Research Initiative Figure 4 long description Note: Figures 1 to 9 (n = 24) Figures 10 to 13 (n = 23) Figure 5 long description Survey respondents and knowledge exchange session participants (herein referred to as 'participants') identified three major gaps in the current funding profile.
The facilitators then made the necessary changes to the notes as prompted by participants to ensure their thoughts and opinions were accurately reflected.
After finalizing the notes, the facilitators organized and arranged all answers in relation to questions, and removed identifiers.
Finally, participants felt the knowledge associated with treatment and therapy outcomes and/or trends including those for high-risk populations, and for people with chronic HCV should be significantly strengthened.